0


i'm about to adjust/clean/lube my chain, and i was wondering if there is any reason for me not to use a super long breaker bar on my torque wrench for tightening the rear axle nut? (only reason i'm asking anyway is i'm weak/lazy).
as far as my rudimentary grasp of physics goes, and my understanding of torque wrenches, there shouldn't be any problems because the force is measured at the head anyways, which should be exclusive of whatever torque multiplier i'm using, which would mean it doesn't matter if i had a 2mi long breaker bar, it'd just be absurdly easy to exceed the torque required.
i just don't want to way overtighten it and clamp my swingarm or do any other damage to it...
anyone have any thoughts?
hurray, strikethrough!
...adventure timeadventure time...adventure time...adventure time
Here's my thought:![]()
![]()
-Pete
NEMRR #81 - ECK Racing
Cyclesmith Track Days
Woodcraft | MTag-Pirelli | OnTrack Media
'03 Tuono | '06 SV650 | '04 CRF250X | '24 Aprilia Tuareg
I wouldn't use any kinda handle extension on a torque wrench.
"I'd rather ride a slow bike fast than a fast bike slow"
Bikes: Ducati: 748 (Track) Honda: RC31 (Race/street)/ CRF 110 Mini Moto/ Hawk Endurance Racer Kawasaki: ZXR1200R
BOMO Instructor
EX# X
depends upon the type of torque wrench. if you are using one of the bar style torque wrenchs i would say no breaker bar. if you look at one of these wrenches the bar pivots in the handle. the correct way to ue this wrench is to keep that pivot centered, meaning the bar is not resting against either side of the handle, it is just supported by the pivot. you would have a very tough time pulling that off with a breaker bar.
if you are using a digi torque or something similar, i would think you would be okay.
in all honesty, it doesn't take 9,000 punds of torque so you should be able to pull it off without the bar.
LRRS EX #165 (formerly)
If its a clicker or beam type of torque wrench, a change in leverage (changing hand position or adding offset square-drive attachments) will result in a different torque value applied to the fastener.
Dial-type torque wrenches are not susceptible to changes in handle length.
sounds good. thanks guys. i'll just suck it up and do it with the naked torque wrench
![]()
Last edited by spicy; 06-17-08 at 10:19 AM.
hurray, strikethrough!
...adventure timeadventure time...adventure time...adventure time
How tight are you making the axle nut??? I weigh all of 135 and have never had a problem getting enough torque from a simple beam scale wrench. Let gravity work in your favor - line the wrench up so you're pushing down instead of pulling up at torque.
As for a helper handle on a torque wrench - It's not the best idea. a long enough handle will give you such a mechanical advantage you can turn a nice torque wrench into scrap without knowing it. Save the helper handle for the 18" breaker bar for taking big stuff apart.
SSearchVT
For every action there is an equal but opposite reaction - and sometimes a scar...
"...i would seriously bite somebody right in the balls..." -bump909
Just what I've heard when using both beam and clickers. You're definitely right as far as doubling the length will allow you to apply same amount of fastener torque w/ 1/2 the effort.
My *guess* would be that the clicker mechanism is not exactly at the head of the wrench (meaning its not directly measuring torque at the center of the fastener). The calibration of the wrench takes this offset into account relative to the handle position. If you look at a clicker (the kind I have anyways), the pivot and clicker mechanism is behind the head a bit.
I have 2 clicker wrenches and both specifically mention to apply force @ the handle and at 90*. And my dial torque wrenches highlight the fact that they aren't affected by handle length (perhaps because they measure torque directly at the head of fastener).
Last edited by keeena; 06-17-08 at 01:08 PM.
you shouldnt need a breaker bar with additional mechanical advantage to take anything apart on a bike.
eat your damn wheaties in the morning
2002 RC51
-Aluminum undertail, custom GP Can and mid-pipe, Jardine 2-1 Header, PC3, EBC Wave Rotors (F&R), CRG's, Goodridge SS Lines, Greggs, Black w/ Flattening and some carbon goodies
USMC - Semper Fi
POW/MIA - Not Forgotten
huh? whether you are applying force 3 inches from the head or 15 inches from the head the same torque is being applied at the head as long as you don't go past the max torque (hear it click). It will just be easier to get it to that value as the moment about the head is changing.
I think people are confusing extensions (off of the head) which can change the torque output.
It should be fine as long as you don't exceed the max torque of the wrench. Most of the torque wrenches I've seen don't have a torque range higher than what you can apply by hand though.
Tim
'05 GSXR1000
Are you using your torque wrench to bust the counter sproket nut loose? I've heard thats a no-no too.
But any reason to get more tools is a good reason in my book.
[edit] This article has some good info re: torque wrenches. It does indicate that clicker wrenches do come w/ instructions to use grip location and not use extensions. "[extension] use will result in erroneous torque readings, and may damage the grip or adjusting screw.” If you look at the construction of the clicker you can see how my comment may make sense (the linkage is well behind the drive). But OTOH the author does try a very simple test w/ an extension and didn't see any noticeable torque difference. <shrug>
Up Tight With Torque Wrenches
Last edited by keeena; 06-17-08 at 02:57 PM. Reason: Added link
I think they tell you not to use a cheater bar is because on most clicker types the adjustment is in the handle which could possibly be damaged by the bar. The internal mechanism still works regardless of where you apply force but if you kink something in the handle with a cheater bar, you just destroyed an expensive tool.
"...i would seriously bite somebody right in the balls..." -bump909
SSearchVT
For every action there is an equal but opposite reaction - and sometimes a scar...